

Loading map...
Energy Builders is a contractor to avoid. We analyzed dozens of reviews and found a company that struggles with basic project execution and customer service. One homeowner discovered only half their solar system was connected after months of questioning low output, and when they needed help with a critical NEM 2 grandfathering application, the company went dark with full voicemail boxes and unanswered emails. Another customer waited from July 2018 to spring 2019 for a project quoted at two weeks, then spent months chasing the company to fix a leak they confirmed but never repaired. The pattern is consistent: 17 reviews cite project management failures, 12 mention post-sale support problems, and 13 question the value after comparing final costs to the work delivered. Communication breakdowns aren't occasional hiccups here, they're the norm. One customer paid for windows, got a leak that damaged their wall, and faced a runaround when requesting repairs. (The owner showed up once, was reportedly rude, then vanished.) Even customers who praised the installation quality later couldn't reach anyone when they needed warranty support.
If you're hoping to lock in the contractor and move on with your life, this isn't that company. The installations that go smoothly earn praise, but the odds of landing in months-long limbo with unanswered calls are too high to justify the gamble.
M L. hired Energy Builders to install solar on their single-family roof a few years back and began tracking output right away. After a few months of low production they pushed the company to send someone; the tech eventually arrived and discovered half the array hadn't been connected. Once that wiring issue was fixed the system ran without further trouble. The real problem surfaced later: when regulators moved from NEM 2 to NEM 3 and owners needed to submit an application to be grandfathered under NEM 2, Energy Builders went silent. Calls go unanswered, the voicemail box is full and emails get no reply, so the company’s warranty and customer-service promises became meaningless during a time-sensitive filing window. What stuck with them was not the initial installation hiccup — which got fixed — but that the installer disappeared when the NEM grandfathering actually mattered.
Bret signed up for a residential solar install that was quoted to take two weeks; the crew began in July 2018 and the job didn’t finish until spring 2019. He ended up with what he calls shoddy workmanship, and his husband had to nitpick the crew to get obvious fixes made. A worker even stood on the outdoor hose bib, leaving it broken and leaking — a problem they discovered themselves after no one volunteered the information. Worse, project-management miscues turned administrative trouble into real risk: mistakes during repairs left their home exposed to a lien. Communication vanished at key moments — numerous texts, calls and voicemails went unanswered — and the owner appeared unaware of what his project manager was doing. At times it seemed an employee’s serious personal or health problems were derailing schedules and follow-up. Last summer they found a roof leak and notified the company in August 2019. One technician visited twice and confirmed the leak; the project manager and the owner later re-confirmed it, yet as of January 14, 2020 the leak still had not been fixed. Bret collected texts, calls, voicemails and video to document every step. The striking takeaway: the job
Ahmad explains he posted under a friend's account because his English is limited and that his real name, Rany Koreel, appears in the company's database. He hired the company to install windows on his home, and one window ended up sitting poorly and leaking into a wall — the water intrusion caused significant interior damage. His brother called and spoke with an employee named Rachel, but the family kept getting passed around and stalled; the company even sent the owner to look at the problem, and the owner behaved rudely. After weeks of back-and-forth, the company told him they would only repair the damage after he had already fixed it himself and then claimed the out-of-pocket charge would be $150 — a figure he found almost laughable given the extent of the damage. He attached photos to document the problem and offered to show others how the company handles complaints. His clear takeaway: document everything and don’t rely on verbal promises — he warns future customers that what looks good at first can leave you paying later.
Passed screening
Passed screening
Operating longer than most installers in the market.
Poor BBB standing. Significant complaints.
Reviews were posted naturally over time.
Barbara G. had Energy Builders coat her family home with Tex-Cote about two years ago and quickly noticed a measurable change: the house stayed warmer in winter and cooler in summer, so the paint began to feel like an extra layer of insulation. During the project Jose fussed over every detail and kept her fully informed, while owner Brad stepped in to clear several obstacles that came up. The crew completed the job cleanly and professionally, and two years on she still feels the seasonal temperature improvement — proof that the product performs and that the team follows through when problems arise.
Henry bought a house about five years ago and, after a big remodel, left the windows for last. He watched his in‑laws get theirs done and loved the result, so he reached out and met Rachel and Brad, the owners. A sales rep came by to measure and walked him through the difference between Dule panel and single‑pane options, and he chose the Dule panel. The standout moment came when Brad personally returned to verify the final measurements — a quick, hands‑on check that made sure everything fit perfectly. The crew installed a custom sliding door and a large front window that significantly boosted curb appeal, and the whole process didn’t take long. Henry couldn’t understand low ratings for the company and wanted to give more than five stars; he asked future customers to request Rachel because her service left a lasting impression every time he opens the windows.
Bob W. hired Energy Builders to put a residential solar array on his house almost four months ago. Brad came out, drew up a composite layout and collected a $1,000 deposit, and a few days later asked for a second payment of just over $7,500 — which he accepted. After that, the timeline went quiet. More than a month passed before Brad returned to take measurements; he put up a few markers, dug some holes, then left the site and never came back. Repeated phone calls to Brad and to Rachel went unanswered, and eventually their numbers appeared to be blocked. Frustrated and out more than $8,500, he and his wife are now preparing legal action. The image that stuck with them — a yard with a few dug holes and a paid-but-unfinished project — is the practical warning a prospective buyer should remember.
John hired Tex Coat to fix numerous holes and cracks in his home's stucco. The crew approached the job with careful attention, treating the repairs as if they were working on their own house, and delivered neat, thorough work. More than two years after completion, the patches have held up and he remains very satisfied with the quality. The long-lasting repairs are what convinced him to tell friends about the company.
Jay ended up with a smooth installation handled by Trey and Luis, who kept the work moving cleanly on site. What made the experience stand out was Oscar taking the time to spell out the available options clearly, so the project felt straightforward from the start rather than like a leap into the dark.
M L. hired Energy Builders to install solar on their single-family roof a few years back and began tracking output right away. After a few months of low production they pushed the company to send someone; the tech eventually arrived and discovered half the array hadn't been connected. Once that wiring issue was fixed the system ran without further trouble. The real problem surfaced later: when regulators moved from NEM 2 to NEM 3 and owners needed to submit an application to be grandfathered under NEM 2, Energy Builders went silent. Calls go unanswered, the voicemail box is full and emails get no reply, so the company’s warranty and customer-service promises became meaningless during a time-sensitive filing window. What stuck with them was not the initial installation hiccup — which got fixed — but that the installer disappeared when the NEM grandfathering actually mattered.
Luis P. ran into trouble when the microinverters on his rooftop solar system started acting up, and at first he struggled to get someone out to diagnose it. After a rough stretch and several on-site visits, Andy, Rachel and the crew kept returning and methodically hunted down the problem. Their persistence resolved the issue, and his system is now functioning properly. The detail that stands out: the team stuck with repeated troubleshooting until the system was fixed.
Bret signed up for a residential solar install that was quoted to take two weeks; the crew began in July 2018 and the job didn’t finish until spring 2019. He ended up with what he calls shoddy workmanship, and his husband had to nitpick the crew to get obvious fixes made. A worker even stood on the outdoor hose bib, leaving it broken and leaking — a problem they discovered themselves after no one volunteered the information. Worse, project-management miscues turned administrative trouble into real risk: mistakes during repairs left their home exposed to a lien. Communication vanished at key moments — numerous texts, calls and voicemails went unanswered — and the owner appeared unaware of what his project manager was doing. At times it seemed an employee’s serious personal or health problems were derailing schedules and follow-up. Last summer they found a roof leak and notified the company in August 2019. One technician visited twice and confirmed the leak; the project manager and the owner later re-confirmed it, yet as of January 14, 2020 the leak still had not been fixed. Bret collected texts, calls, voicemails and video to document every step. The striking takeaway: the job
Krista P.'s residential solar setup turned into a nearly year-long headache when financial issues never got resolved. She discovered the company had blocked her attempts to contact them and had shut her solar system off — despite the company owing her money. The clearest takeaway: after almost a year she remained without service, owed funds, and no way to reach the installer to fix the problem.
Long-term satisfaction for Energy Builders, inc holds steady at 3.2 ★. This is better than 89% of installers we looked at.
Long-term reviews carry the most weight in our methodology because they are most representative of what you should be paying for: a system that will perform for years.