

Loading map...
Streamline Energy is a company to avoid. We analyzed nearly a hundred reviews and found a pattern of unresponsive service, broken promises, and installations that stretch over a year. One homeowner described their panels sitting idle for 16 months while Streamline blamed the utility, only to reveal they'd forgotten basic paperwork. Another is still chasing a $2,500 incentive check a year after their system went live, with no one returning calls. Reviews reveal a 27-to-0 split on post-sale support, meaning we couldn't find a single positive mention of follow-up care. Two dozen customers report the same spiral: enthusiastic sales reps vanish after signing, then silence. The monitoring software doesn't work, techs don't show up when promised, and one reviewer is now paying both a loan payment and a full electric bill because no one will activate the system. A few early customers had smooth installs, but those reviews are from 2020 and 2021. By 2022, the experience had clearly deteriorated.
If you're considering Streamline, know that the odds of a functional install with reliable support are stacked against you. The small number of satisfied customers all signed years ago, before the company's service collapsed. Look elsewhere.
Vianey M hired the company to install solar panels on her house in April 2021. The crew started the job, left saying they'd return later that day, and after two days she had to call to find out when technicians would be back. Someone did come roughly two weeks later to finish the physical install, but activation dragged on — the array wasn’t turned on until August 2022. The firm blamed the utility, Centerpoint, but each setback traced back to the installer repeatedly forgetting to place and submit the small sticker Centerpoint required, forcing extra trips and needless delays. Contacting the company became a chore: phone calls went unanswered and the occasional response was the same promise that accounting had been contacted and payment would be rushed. The last straw arrived in late July 2023 when the $2,500 check they pledged after activation still hadn’t shown up. She ended up with a working system only after about 16 months and an unpaid payout almost a year after activation — a string of missed calls, repeated on-site fixes, and unfulfilled promises that would stick with any buyer.
Gazi K bought a solar package directly from the company owner in March 2020 for his home, lured by promises of credits, money-back guarantees and the idea that the system would erase his electricity bill. He discovered the setup never worked correctly and he has never been able to monitor how much the panels actually produce. What began as a high-pressure sales pitch turned into ongoing frustration: he found the promised credits and refunds were essentially false, and the team had sold him an expensive system that didn’t deliver. The installation even forced him to switch electric providers because his bills kept fluctuating on top of the panel payments. Over the years technicians showed up repeatedly to troubleshoot the monitoring failure but none fixed the problem, and several company contacts stopped responding. He contacted Mercedeh multiple times only to have the issue passed around internally and repeatedly dropped. Now fed up and without a functioning monitoring system or clear answers, he is preparing to take legal action unless the company reaches out. The detail that lingers: years of technicians who couldn’t resolve the same monitoring failure and a string of vanished or
Roxanne G. had a solar system put on her family’s home on May 3, but it never got turned on — leaving her to cover both the financing invoice to Mosaic and her regular PEC electric bill. She traded emails with company contacts Joanne and Mike since the install but reached no solution and received no call to schedule activation or finish the setup. Paying more than $300 a month was not the plan, and after the sales rep left shortly after the installation, she felt abandoned and taken advantage of. She also contacted Mosaic and discovered they hadn’t moved the process forward, so she’s effectively paying for a service that hasn’t been delivered. She asked the company to either complete activation or remove the array from the house, calling the whole situation “sickening and criminal.” The concrete takeaway: installed on May 3, still inactive, monthly outlay over $300 — she wants a clear activation date or the system removed.
Passed screening
Passed screening
Poor BBB standing. Significant complaints.
Reviews were posted naturally over time.
Anna opened her door to a Streamline Energy representative who patiently walked her through the benefits of going solar, making the options clear and approachable. She found the rep informative and kind, which removed a lot of the usual uncertainty around solar decisions. The installation ran about a day later than planned but still wrapped up quickly overall. She ended up recommending Streamline Energy to neighbors and friends, with the rep’s friendly, educational approach being the detail that stuck with her.
Gazi K bought a solar package directly from the company owner in March 2020 for his home, lured by promises of credits, money-back guarantees and the idea that the system would erase his electricity bill. He discovered the setup never worked correctly and he has never been able to monitor how much the panels actually produce. What began as a high-pressure sales pitch turned into ongoing frustration: he found the promised credits and refunds were essentially false, and the team had sold him an expensive system that didn’t deliver. The installation even forced him to switch electric providers because his bills kept fluctuating on top of the panel payments. Over the years technicians showed up repeatedly to troubleshoot the monitoring failure but none fixed the problem, and several company contacts stopped responding. He contacted Mercedeh multiple times only to have the issue passed around internally and repeatedly dropped. Now fed up and without a functioning monitoring system or clear answers, he is preparing to take legal action unless the company reaches out. The detail that lingers: years of technicians who couldn’t resolve the same monitoring failure and a string of vanished or
Stephen Q had a residential solar installation completed in 2022 and has been chasing the post‑install inspection ever since. He reached out repeatedly to get the inspector to return and finish the required check, but each call landed in voicemail and nobody returned his calls. On top of that, the company promised a check after the install that he still hasn’t received despite multiple follow‑up calls. What stuck with him was that the sales team was eager to close the deal, but after the system was in place the company became effectively unreachable—no finished inspection and no promised payment.
Alleta B. had solar panels installed on her home about three years ago. She has been trying to reach the installer since 2023 and discovered that, as of 2025, the company still listed an incorrect phone number. Even though the array remains under warranty, her electric bill no longer shows the expected savings, and the company’s advertising and contact channels appear to have disappeared. She’s asking for help locating the installer and left her contact at abronaugh565@gmail.com — the standout problem being a warranted system that isn’t saving money while the installer has become effectively unreachable.
Peter5paul B. had a solar system installed in 2021 and discovered the microinverters never worked at full capacity from day one. The company monitored the system but made no real effort to repair or replace the faulty inverters, and he ran into a wall trying to reach anyone — phone calls, messages and emails went unanswered. When he finally did connect, he got the runaround: initial correspondence with Joanne Janho ended when she left the company, and later contact with Susana Ibarra stopped when she stopped returning calls and emails. After years of silence he filed a complaint with the Better Business Bureau and received no response. He points out there was a lawsuit filed against the company and now a class action is being assembled alleging breach of contract and poor consumer practices. He also found the financing partner, Mosiac Financing, just as unhelpful — money taken, what he considers inadequate equipment installed, then the companies disappeared. He would have given zero stars if the scale allowed.
Vianey M hired the company to install solar panels on her house in April 2021. The crew started the job, left saying they'd return later that day, and after two days she had to call to find out when technicians would be back. Someone did come roughly two weeks later to finish the physical install, but activation dragged on — the array wasn’t turned on until August 2022. The firm blamed the utility, Centerpoint, but each setback traced back to the installer repeatedly forgetting to place and submit the small sticker Centerpoint required, forcing extra trips and needless delays. Contacting the company became a chore: phone calls went unanswered and the occasional response was the same promise that accounting had been contacted and payment would be rushed. The last straw arrived in late July 2023 when the $2,500 check they pledged after activation still hadn’t shown up. She ended up with a working system only after about 16 months and an unpaid payout almost a year after activation — a string of missed calls, repeated on-site fixes, and unfulfilled promises that would stick with any buyer.
David M. has spent seven months trying to get the installer back to his house to fix a residential solar system that was installed in December 2021 and is producing under 10% of the expected energy. He struggled to reach a live person, watched emails go unanswered for weeks or months, and kept getting the same excuse that the company was "busy" while nothing changed. After repeated attempts to have the system serviced under the company’s warranty failed, he began preparing legal action — both an individual lawsuit and an invitation to join a class action — and plans to involve Mosaic as a potential co-defendant. He also searched public records and found no clear registration for the Streamline Energy name operating in Texas, or suspects the work might be done under a different corporate name to obscure ownership. What lingers most from his experience is a nearly nonfunctional system installed months ago, persistent silence from the installer, and a homeowner pushed to litigation to force a resolution.
Sarwar signed on for a $45,000 financed solar system for his home, expecting the installer to deliver the rebates and bill credits they promised. He walked into the deal after sales reps pledged a rebate within seven days and three months’ worth of bill credit, and he agreed to a loan through Mosaic with an advertised monthly payment of $129. Within months that $129 payment jumped to $186; Mosaic pointed to the fine print in the contract, and attempts to get answers from the company went nowhere. He contacted Andrew Foley and Samuel Dealty, who assured him the payment would stay at $129, only to discover they left the company and that he’d signed more than one contract. Support showed up for a few weeks after he raised issues, then stopped entirely. After months of back-and-forth he had to involve the BBB to obtain the rebate that had been promised within seven days. Now he’s carrying two bills each month — nearly $150 for electricity plus $186 for the solar loan — and feels abandoned by a team that changed employees frequently. The lasting detail that stuck with him: the unexpected jump in the financed payment and the need to escalate to the BBB to get what was promised.
Robert S. had solar panels installed on his home in February 2025 and quickly ran into trouble: he found the system’s monitoring software didn’t work and discovered the company stopped responding to any communication a year ago. He experienced repeated unanswered messages and, frustrated, accused the business of fraud while naming owners Joe Hernandez and Michael Williams. He also pointed to the company’s public record—49 complaints over three years and an F rating from the Better Business Bureau. The clearest takeaway: an installed system with nonfunctioning software and no post‑install support, backed by a string of complaints and an F rating, left him unable to get fixes or answers.
Long-term satisfaction for Streamline Energy drops to 1.0 ★ compared to early reviews. This decline is worse than 62% of installers we looked at.
Long-term reviews carry the most weight in our methodology because they are most representative of what you should be paying for: a system that will perform for years.